CFP last date
01 April 2024
Reseach Article

Best Combinations of Software Practices from CDP Model by using Crystal Ball Tool to Achieve Quality Goals of an Organization

by Rachna Lekh, Pooja
Communications on Applied Electronics
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 1 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Rachna Lekh, Pooja
10.5120/cae-1628

Rachna Lekh, Pooja . Best Combinations of Software Practices from CDP Model by using Crystal Ball Tool to Achieve Quality Goals of an Organization. Communications on Applied Electronics. 1, 8 ( May 2015), 23-29. DOI=10.5120/cae-1628

@article{ 10.5120/cae-1628,
author = { Rachna Lekh, Pooja },
title = { Best Combinations of Software Practices from CDP Model by using Crystal Ball Tool to Achieve Quality Goals of an Organization },
journal = { Communications on Applied Electronics },
issue_date = { May 2015 },
volume = { 1 },
number = { 8 },
month = { May },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 2394-4714 },
pages = { 23-29 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://www.caeaccess.org/archives/volume1/number8/355-1628/ },
doi = { 10.5120/cae-1628 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2023-09-04T18:38:12.499670+05:30
%A Rachna Lekh
%A Pooja
%T Best Combinations of Software Practices from CDP Model by using Crystal Ball Tool to Achieve Quality Goals of an Organization
%J Communications on Applied Electronics
%@ 2394-4714
%V 1
%N 8
%P 23-29
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper presents the results of the best combinations executed by using crystal ball tool to achieve quality and time constraint goals of an organization. The software practices of SDLC phases used from the CDP model [1]. This paper reveals that how crystal ball has executed the different combinations or simulations to find the best combination to be used further for a particular domain i. e. for particular type of projects. For example: software applications such as web applications, mobile applications and so on. This is was done as the part of process improvement of a software organization "Saber Corps (made up)". This whole process represents the output of process improvement process of an organization.

References
  1. Rachna Lekh, Pooja Choudhary, "Exhaustive Study of SDLC Phases & Their Best Practices to create CDP Model for Process Improvement", IEEE(2015).
  2. Rachna Lekh, Pooja Choudhary, "Study on Various methodologies/Frameworks used to achieve Software Quality in different organizations", International Journal of Computer Applications(0975-8887) Volume 108 – No. 5, December (2014).
  3. AedahAbd Rahman, ShamsulSahibuddin&Suhaini Ibrahim, "A Study of ProcessImprovement Best Practices", IEEE(2011).
  4. Shubo XU, Dishi Xu, "Project Management methodologies": Are they sufficient to develop quality software", IEEE(2011)
  5. Mejhem Yousef Al – Tarawneh, Mohd. Syazwan Abdullah &JasemAlostad, "Software Development Process Improvement Framework(SDPIFs) for small software development firms(SSDFs)" , International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), Vol. 10, Issue 1, (2013).
  6. T. R. Gopalakrishnan Nair, V. Suma, P. Kumar Tiwari, "Significance of depth inspection & inspection performance metrics for consistent defect management in software industry", The Institute of Engineering & Technology(IET), Vol. 6, Issue 6, pp 524-535,(2012)
  7. Changli Sun, "Software Document quality Measurement – A Fuzzy approach" , IEEE(2010).
  8. Li Wei, lin Xiao , Yu Wuyi, Yin Zhao, Cai, Jianhuai& Li Maoqing, "The Research Appliance of Multi Layer Fuzzy Comprehensive evaluation in the Appraisal of software quality", IEEE(2008).
  9. AhmadJavanBakht, Mohsen Fallah Rad &FarshadAkbari, "Using Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making in evaluation of software quality", IEEE(2010).
  10. ISO/IEC 9126-3: Software Engineering – Product Quality – Part 3 : Internal Metrics,2002
  11. Nithya G. Nair, Suma V, T. R. Gopalakrishnan, "Estimation of Characterstics of software team for implementing effective process through Inspection Performance Metrics".
  12. Bob McFeeley, "A User Guide for Software Process Improvement",Software Engineering Institute (SEI), Feb 1996.
  13. ISO/IEC 9126-1: 2001, Software Engineering-Product Quality-Part 1: Quality Model
  14. N. R. Shashi Kumar, T. R. Gopalakrishnan, V. Suma, "An Analytical Approach for project Manager in Effective Defect Management in Software Process", IEEE, 2011.
  15. Poornima U. S, Suma V, "Significance of Quality Metrics during Software Development Process"
  16. V. Suma, T. R. Gopalakrishnan, ""Defect Management using DI & IPM.
  17. Tom Kendrick, ""Defining & Implementing Metrics for Project Risk Reduction".
  18. Caper Jones, "Three Harmul Metrics & Two Helpful Metrics", 2012
  19. TopiHaapio, " Improving Effort Management in Software Development Projects", Publications of University of eastern Finaland, 2011.
  20. Sylvie Trudel, Jean Marc Lavoie, Marie-Claude Pare, WitoldSuryn, "PEM: The Small Company Dedicated Software Process Quality Evaluation Method combining CMMI & ISO/IEC 14598, Springer, 2006"
  21. Stephen H. Kan, "Metrics & Models in software quality engineering", Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc. Boston, MA, 2002.
  22. Jozef Pajzinka, "Quality optimization in IT organization using strategic process management methods", Masaryk University, 2013.
  23. Alan Ramias & Cheric Wilkins, "Building Metrics for a process", Process Improvement, Sept 2010.
  24. Sandro Felder, "Achieving CMMi compliance with Scrum focusing on ML2 Project management", Business Information systems, University of Applied Sciences & Arts, Northwestern Switzerland, 2013.
  25. Kanen A. LaFond, "The Evaluation of Project management performance on two software maintenance projects based on a CMMi Framework" , 2006
  26. Crystal Ball User Guide/Brochure, Online Material regarding Crystal Ball by Oracle.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Software quality best combinations of software practices.