Call for Paper

CAE solicits original research papers for the January 2019 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is December 31, 2018.

Read More

Evaluation of Intersystem Interference between NavIC, GPS and Galileo

Deepak Mishra, Sanghamitra Banik, Shalvi Bhatnagar. Published in Information Systems.

Communications on Applied Electronics
Year of Publication: 2018
Publisher: Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Authors: Deepak Mishra, Sanghamitra Banik, Shalvi Bhatnagar
10.5120/cae2018652737

Deepak Mishra, Sanghamitra Banik and Shalvi Bhatnagar. Evaluation of Intersystem Interference between NavIC, GPS and Galileo. Communications on Applied Electronics 7(12):7-11, January 2018. BibTeX

@article{10.5120/cae2018652737,
	author = {Deepak Mishra and Sanghamitra Banik and Shalvi Bhatnagar},
	title = {Evaluation of Intersystem Interference between NavIC, GPS and Galileo},
	journal = {Communications on Applied Electronics},
	issue_date = {January 2018},
	volume = {7},
	number = {12},
	month = {Jan},
	year = {2018},
	issn = {2394-4714},
	pages = {7-11},
	numpages = {5},
	url = {http://www.caeaccess.org/archives/volume7/number12/793-2018652737},
	doi = {10.5120/cae2018652737},
	publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
	address = {New York, USA}
}

Abstract

The paper provides an assessment of compatibility among NavIC, GPS and Galileo systems. Simulations are performed taking into account the intersystem interference between NavIC and GPS system in L5 band and NavIC and Galileo in L5 and E5a band on Indian region. Parameters considered in simulation are Space Constellation, ground cycle repeat time of satellite, EIRP etc. It is shown that the intersystem interference of Galileo caused by NavIC is slightly larger than interference of IRNSS due to Galileo. Similarly, the intersystem interference of GPS caused by NavIC is slightly larger than interference of NavIC due to GPS. Maximum interference is considered for all the cases.

References

  1. www.ieea.fr
  2. www.navipedia.com
  3. Wallner S, Hein G W, Pany T, Avila-Rodriguez J A, and Posfay A, “Interference computations between GPS and Galileo”, In Proceeding of ION GNSS 2005, pp. 861-876, 2005.
  4. Godet J, “GPS Galileo radio frequency compatibility analysis”, In Proceeding of ION GPS 2000 International Technical Meeting, 2000. Li C X, Liu W M, and Fu Z N, “GPS/TDOA Hybrid Location Algorithm Based on Federal Kalman Filter”, JCIT, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 42-48, 2010.
  5. RAN Yi-hang, LIU Yu-qi, HU Xiu-lin, KE Ting, “Interference Analysis of Interplex Modulation in GALILEO E1 Band”, Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2009. WiCom '09. 5th International Conference , Page(s):1 - 4 ,E-ISBN :978-1-4244-3693-4,Print ISBN: 978-1-4244-3692-7, INSPEC Accession Number: 10952820 .
  6. Klobuchar J (1986), “Design and characteristics of the GPS ionospheric time delay algorithm for single frequency users”, Proceedings of PLANS’86-position location and navigation Symposium, Las Vegas, Nevada.
  7. Evaluation of Intersystem Interference between Compass and Galileo RAN Yi-hang, LIU Yu-qi, HU Xiu-lin, KE Ting Journal of Convergence Information Technology, Volume6, Number 6, June 2011.
  8. Betz J W and Goldstein D B, “Candidate designs for an additional civil signal in GPS spectral bands”, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA, 2002.
  9. Betz J W, “Effect of partial-band interference on receiver estimation of CN0”, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA, 2000.
  10. Hoffmann-Wellenhof, Lichtennegger, Wasle, “GNSS Global Navigation Satellite Systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo & more”, SpringerWeinNewYork.
  11. John W. Betz, “Binary Offset Carrier Modulations for Radio navigation”, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts Received September 2001; Revised March 2002
  12. Gunter W Hein, Markus Irsinger, Jose Angel Avila radriguez and Thomas Pany, “Performance analysis of L1 Galelio Signals”, Institute of Geodesy and Navigation, University FAF Munich, Germany.
  13. Wei Liu, Yuan Hu, Xingqun Zhan, and Chuanrun Zhai, “Assessing Radio Frequency Compatibility between Galileo and Compass”, Defence Science Journal, Vol. 61, No. 6, November 2011, pp. 545-553, DOI: 10.14429/dsj.61.285.
  14. Hopfield HS (1969), “Two quadratic tropospheric refractivity profile for correcting satellite data”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(18):4487-4499.
  15. Dr NBS Srilatha Indira Dutt, Shaik Gowsuddin, “ionosphere Delay Estimation using Klobuchar Algorithm for single frequency GPS receiver”, IJARCE, Vol2, Issue2 feb2013.
  16. S.Wallner and G.W.Hein, “Interference computation between GPS and Galileo”, ION,pp.1-15.
  17. Stefan Wallner, Guenter W Hein and Jose- Angel Avila – Rodriguz, “Interference computation between several GNSS systems”, Institute of Geodesy and Navigation, University FAF Munich, Germany.
  18. Simon Haykin, “Digital Communications”, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd.
  19. Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW, Buck JR (1999), “Discrete –time signal processing”, second edition, Prentice Hall, London.
  20. A,Hornbostel, “Propagation problems in satellite navigation”, DLR, Institute of Communication.
  21. Elliot D. Kaplan, Christopher J. Hegarty, Artech House, “Understanding GPS Principles and Applications”, Artech House Publications.
  22. J.A. Avila-Rodriguez, “On generalized signal waveforms for satellite navigation’’, PhD dissertation University FAF Munich, Neubiberg, Germany, pp. 408, June 2008.
  23. GPS Interface Specification (ICD) , IRN-IS-200F-001: 21st Sept. 2011 .
  24. GLONASS Interface Control Document, version-5.0, 2002.
  25. GALILEO Signal-In-Space, ICD, May 2006.
  26. QZSS Interface Specification (ICD), IS-QZSS, ver 1.4, 28th Feb. 2012.
  27. CDR document IRNSS, ISRO-SAC-IRNSS-CDR-01, JUNE 2102.

Keywords

NavIC, GPS, Galileo